To link to this article, copy this persistent link:
(May 31, 2011) The Government of Sri Lanka plans to appoint a panel of five judges to begin a new investigation of human rights violations in the northeastern part of the country. The body will report its findings to Sri Lanka's Human Rights Commission (HRC). The focus of the investigation will be on complaints lodged by internally displaced persons, from whom the HRC has reportedly already received "a large number of complaints of torture and human rights violations," although the public at large throughout the country may also file new complaints. (Sandun A. Jayasekera, Govt. to Start Fresh Probe on HR Violations, DAILY MIRROR (May 26, 2011).)
According to Supreme Court Justice Priyantha Perera, the newly appointed HRC Chairman, three members of the panel will be Sinhalese judges and the other two will be judges from the Tamil and Muslim communities, all selected from among retired Supreme Court and Court of Appeal judges. Perera stated, "I expect to commence the process from June and the response has been encouraging for the calling of applications. The judges will act independently under the mandate of the HRC. They will be paid on case by case basis they conclude, not a monthly remuneration [sic]." (Id.)
Perera added that he would summon respondents who failed to comply with HRC recommendations (e.g., police officers), ordering them to show cause, and that he had obtained the Chief of Police's agreement to initiate "a constant dialogue with the HRC." It is the duty of complainants to inform the HRC and the Inspector General of non-compliance with the recommendations. (Id.) Perera also indicated that the HRC would appoint human rights officers in every region of the country to handle acts of violation of human rights and also engage with Sri Lankan civil rights groups and non-government organizations to foster respect for human rights. (Id.)
Perera plans to propose amendments to the Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka Act of 1996 that would give the HRC the power to deal directly with respondents who have persisted in ignoring its recommendations. The Act currently provides for the HRC to refer such acts of non-compliance to the President, who in turn refers them to Parliament, which, according to the Justice, is an ineffective procedure. (Id.; Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka Act No. 21 of 1996 (certified on Aug. 21, 1996), Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka website.)
|Author:||Wendy Zeldin More by this author|
|Topic:||Human rights and civil liberties More on this topic|
|Jurisdiction:||Sri Lanka More about this jurisdiction|
Search Legal News
Find legal news by topic, country, keyword, date, or author.
Global Legal Monitor RSS
Get the Global Legal Monitor delivered to your inbox. Sign up for RSS service.
The Global Legal Monitor is an online publication from the Law Library of Congress covering legal news and developments worldwide. It is updated frequently and draws on information from the Global Legal Information Network, official national legal publications, and reliable press sources. You can find previous news by searching the GLM.
Last updated: 05/31/2011