To link to this article, copy this persistent link:

(Jan 11, 2012) The

High Court of England and Wales recently ruled that the civil recovery process used by the Serious Organised Crime Agency to take possession of property obtained from the proceeds or profits of money laundering or drug dealing is lawful, even if there has been no criminal conviction in the case. The Court found that the lack of a criminal conviction was not conclusive evidence that the defendant did not commit the criminal act. For civil recovery orders, the Agency simply needed to satisfy the civil burden of proof – that, on the balance of probabilities, the property was derived from drug dealing or money laundering. In these cases, the Court held, it is not necessary to specify the offenses from which the money has been derived; the authorities may simply show the types of unlawful conduct that resulted in the proceeds. This, combined with a failure to account for how the property was obtained, is sufficient to make the property subject to a civil recovery order, according to the Court. (Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, c.29; Serious Organised Crime Agency v Hymans & Ors [2011] EWHC 3332 (QB).)

Author: Clare Feikert-Ahalt More by this author
Topic: Administrative law and regulatory procedures More on this topic
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom More about this jurisdiction

Search Legal News
Find legal news by topic, country, keyword, date, or author.

Global Legal Monitor RSS
Get the Global Legal Monitor delivered to your inbox. Sign up for RSS service.

The Global Legal Monitor is an online publication from the Law Library of Congress covering legal news and developments worldwide. It is updated frequently and draws on information from the Global Legal Information Network, official national legal publications, and reliable press sources. You can find previous news by searching the GLM.

Last updated: 01/11/2012