United States: New York Court Upholds Constitutionality of Condemnation of Private Property for Removal of Blight
To link to this article, copy this persistent link:
(Dec 14, 2009) The New York Court of Appeals, New York State's highest court, has held that a state condemnation authority can use its eminent domain power to acquire property for a private development project to remove urban blight.
The case involves a private developer's plan to develop 22 acres in Brooklyn for a basketball stadium, transportation improvements, affordable and market-priced housing, and open space. The project was sponsored by New York State's development agency, which used its condemnation authority to acquire those properties the developer was unable to purchase directly. Property owners challenged the taking, arguing the exercise of eminent domain is permissible under the New York State Constitution only for a "public use," and that this taking was for a private benefit. The lower court rejected this argument, and the property owners appealed to the New York Court of Appeals.
The Court of Appeals rejected the landowners' claims. It observed that rehabilitation of a blighted area is constitutionally sanctioned "public use" and a legitimate basis for exercising the power of eminent domain. While the landowners argued the properties in question were not blighted, the court said that the blight determination was a province of the legislative branch and could only be disturbed by the judiciary if the agency to which the legislature delegated this power acted irrationally or baselessly, which it found was not the case here. The court stated that the determination of whether blight should no longer serve as a predicate for the exercise of eminent domain should be left to the policy-making branches of government. A dissenting judge argued that the use of condemnation to eradicate blight should be used only in cases involving a threat to "public health and safety," and disagreed with the court's deference to the agency's determination. (Goldstein v. New York State Urb. Dev. Corp., No. 178 (N.Y. Nov. 24, 2009), available at http://www.nycourts.gov/ctapps/decisions/2009/nov09/178opn09.pdf.)
- Author: John Cannan More by this author
- Topic: Real property More on this topic
- Jurisdiction: United States More about this jurisdiction
Search Legal News
Find legal news by topic, country, keyword, date, or author.
Global Legal Monitor RSS
Get the Global Legal Monitor delivered to your inbox. Sign up for RSS service.
The Global Legal Monitor is an online publication from the Law Library of Congress covering legal news and developments worldwide. It is updated frequently and draws on information from the Global Legal Information Network, official national legal publications, and reliable press sources. You can find previous news by searching the GLM.
Last updated: 12/14/2009