To link to this article, copy this persistent link:
(Mar 04, 2013) On December 13, 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) issued a final judgment in a case involving a German national of Lebanese origin, who was arrested by authorities of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) acting on suspicion of his having ties with terrorist organizations, under the so-called rendition program organized by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Khaled El-Masri, the applicant, won the case and was awarded €60,000 (about US$79,000) for non-pecuniary damage. (Case of El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Eur.
El-Masri was arrested while crossing the border of the FYROM and kept incommunicado for 23 days in Skopje, where he was questioned. Subsequently, the applicant was transferred to the airport, where he was beaten and tortured, blindfolded and taken by force to an airplane, and then transferred to
In the United States, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a claim on behalf of El-Masri against the former CIA Director and unnamed CIA agents for being involved in the case. That case was dismissed, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to review it, citing the position that the U.S. interest in preserving state secrets outweighs the individual's right to seek and receive justice. Similarly, El-Masri's efforts to bring a criminal suit against law enforcement officials in the FYROM was also dismissed. (
During the period 2006-2007, several European states began investigating allegations that CIA operatives were involved in extraordinary rendition cases involving individuals who were transferred to secret places and tortured, including the El-Masri case. An in-depth investigation, undertaken by the Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe under the leadership of Dick Marty, concluded that the El-Masri case was a case of "documented rendition" and that the FYROM's government account of events was "utterly untenable." (
Proceedings Before the ECHR
El-Masri based his application on several articles of the European Convention of Human Rights and claimed that his rights were violated. The provisions of the Convention he mentioned included article 3, (inhuman and degrading treatment), article 5 (right to liberty and security), article 8 (violation of the right to respect for private and family life), and article 13 (denial of a right to an effective remedy). (Case of El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, supra; European Convention on Human Rights (as amended to June 1, 2010), Council of Europe website.)
The ECHR held that the facts of the case were sufficiently convincing and established beyond any reasonable doubt that El-Masri was tortured and that the government of the FYROM failed to prove its version of events. Based on article 3 of the Convention, the ECHR found against the FYROM, citing El-Masri's incommunicado detention in the hotel in Skopje, which amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. The Court also found that his subjection to torture at the hands of the CIA agents at the Skopje airport and in front of officials of the FYROM was also in violation of article 3. (Case of El-Masri v. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, supra.)
Based on article 5 of the Convention, the ECHR held that the FYROM was responsible for infringing on El-Masri's rights due to the lack of a court order for his detention and the absence of custody records. The Court also concluded that the FYROM had violated the applicant's right to private and family life and his right to an effective remedy in the absence of any effective investigation of his complaints. (
|Author:||Theresa Papademetriou More by this author|
|Topic:||Human rights More on this topic|
|Jurisdiction:||European Court of Human Rights More about this jurisdiction|
Search Legal News
Find legal news by topic, country, keyword, date, or author.
Global Legal Monitor RSS
Get the Global Legal Monitor delivered to your inbox. Sign up for RSS service.
The Global Legal Monitor is an online publication from the Law Library of Congress covering legal news and developments worldwide. It is updated frequently and draws on information from the Global Legal Information Network, official national legal publications, and reliable press sources. You can find previous news by searching the GLM.
Last updated: 03/04/2013